Media releases

• Brock event to lead international conversation on sustainability reporting

  Monday, May 10, 2021 | By Brock University

  MEDIA RELEASE: 10 May 2021 – R0057

  The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the focus on environmental, social and governance issues by investors, policy makers and educators. But the absence of a global standard is hindering the widespread adoption of sustainability reporting.

  To help shape the future course of sustainability reporting, Brock University is bringing together global experts to kickstart a discussion Friday, May 14 from 9 to 11 a.m. To date, more than 3,500 participants have already registered for the online event being hosted by the Goodman School of Business’ CPA Ontario Centre for Public Policy and Innovation in Accounting.

  “Goodman is proud to welcome the leading experts in sustainability reporting and practitioners from around the world to engage in a dialogue on this important topic,” said Goodman Dean Andrew Gaudes.

  The event will feature two sustainability reporting panels, the first looking at meeting stakeholder needs and the second discussing materiality versus corporate greenwashing.

  The stakeholder needs panel moderated by Goodman Accounting Professor Fayaz Elayan will feature: Irene Heemskerk, Sustainability Fellow at the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation; Robert Hirth, Co-Vice Chair of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board; Carol Wilding, President and CEO of CPA Ontario; and Anup Srivastava, Canada Research Chair in Accounting at the University of Calgary.

  Mengtian Li, Assistant Professor of Accounting at Goodman, will moderate the materiality versus greenwashing panel featuring: Rosemary McGuire, Director of External Reporting and Capital Markets at CPA Canada; Patrick Kabuya, Senior Governance Specialist at the World Bank; Jo-anne Matear, Manager of Corporate Finance at the Ontario Securities Commission; and Samir Trabelsi, Professor of Accounting and Governance at Goodman.

  Trabelsi, who is also the event organizer, says business reporting has expanded beyond financial reporting and it’s important for practitioners and users to have these discussions.

  “Sustainability standards should be stakeholder driven but there needs to be a set of checks and balances put in place to keep organizations from engaging in greenwashing,” he says. “The accounting profession has an obligation to stay informed, to communicate and be an active participant in shaping the future course of sustainability reporting.”

  Brock President Gervan Fearon, who is also a CPA, CGA, is looking forward to the University hosting this important conversation.

  “The environmental, social and government (ESG) approach is expanding the definition of corporate social responsibility and its implications within the accounting profession,” Fearon says. “Without question, ESG factors affect both the income statement and balance sheet of organizations and, equally important, how corporations and organizations make decisions.” 

  He says corporations can no longer ignore ESG issues.

  “We must take them into account in fulfilling fiduciary responsibilities and duty of care which increasingly extend beyond the corporations’ financial statements alone to include the social fabric of the very societies in which corporations operate,” says Fearon. “Corporate reputation, goodwill and social license are increasingly being defined by ESG.”

  The free event is open to the public and interested participants can register here to receive the link to the livestream. A video recording will be made available for those not able to attend the event live.

  For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

  * Dan Dakin, Manager Communications and Media Relations, Brock University [email protected] or 905-347-1970

  – 30 –

  Categories: Media releases

• Research shows online voting could be transformative for Indigenous communities

  Monday, May 03, 2021 | By Brock University

  MEDIA RELEASE: 3 May 2021 – R0056

  New research published on Monday, May 3 shows that online voting could have a significant impact on the democratic process in Indigenous communities.

  “Indigenous Experiences with Online Voting” is the result of eight years of research by Chelsea Gabel, Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Well-being, Community Engagement and Innovation and an Associate Professor at McMaster University, and Nicole Goodman, Brock University Associate Professor of Political Science and Chancellor’s Chair for Research Excellence.

  The report and its recommendations are the result of long-standing research collaborations with Indigenous communities as part of the First Nations Digital Democracy Project. The research was carried out with communities, taking their guidance on research design, questions and project outcomes.

  Through a community-engaged research approach, Gabel and Goodman found that online voting is appealing to Indigenous communities as a way to enhance participation, self-determination and governance. It can also serve as a tool to improve voting accessibility and engagement for members living off-reserve.

  The findings also suggest online voting adoption enhances inclusiveness and the representation of voices in key community decision-making.

  “The importance of this report and its recommendations has been magnified by the COVID-19 pandemic,” says Goodman. “Voting and elections have been affected in many communities and First Nations should be able to choose balloting options that work best for the health and well-being of their community.”

  She points out that a recent Ipsos poll found that a majority of Canadians feel holding an election during COIVD-19 would be unsafe and unfair.

  “Our report on Indigenous experiences with online voting speaks to online ballots as an alternative voting mode that governments could consider to maintain public health and continue with elections,” Goodman says.

  Gabel, who is Métis from Rivers, Man., said Indigenous communities played a significant role in the research. The report draws on the experiences of three First Nations: Tsuut’ina Nation, Wasauksing First Nation and Nipissing First Nation, and the community was involved at every stage of the process, including providing feedback on the draft report and its recommendations.

  “This report is unique because it’s directed, driven and led by community,” she says. “Through our Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council-funded First Nations Digital Democracy project, we cultivated strong relationships with First Nations partners. It is the only project in the world that combines community engaged scholarship and technology to explore Indigenous experiences with online voting.”

  Along with a number of good practices and next steps, the report offers eight recommendations:

  • Amend relevant regulations to allow First Nations to have the choice of using alternative voting methods, such as online voting, in their elections and referendums.
  • Increase earmarked core funding provided by the Government of Canada that could be carried over and support deployment of online and other voting methods.
  • Support the development of a National Centre of Excellence or expansion of the First Nations Digital Democracy Project.
  • Enhance responsiveness from the Government of Canada and additional support for Indigenous elections and votes.
  • Create a security framework for online voting implementation.
  • Work with community-owned service providers to enhance internet connectivity and digital literacy in First Nations.
  • Provide additional research support from Indigenous Services Canada/Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada and Tri-Council Agencies for community-engaged research with Indigenous communities focusing on technology.
  • Explore the development of online voting technologies.

  Goodman and Gabel say the first key priority is to amend the Indian Band Election Regulations, Indian Referendum Regulations and First Nations Elections Act Regulations to allow for the use of alternative voting methods in First Nations elections and referendums.

  “First Nations should have the opportunity to innovate their election processes to potentially better reach members,” says Gabel. “Given the government’s narrative of reconciliation and support for a nation-to-nation approach to working with Indigenous communities, there is a timely opportunity to reform both the Indian Act and the First Nations Election Act to give First Nations the autonomy to decide for themselves which voting methods work best for their community.” 

  From there, the technology also must be stabilized by working with community-owned service providers and undertaking activities to enhance internet connectivity and digital literacy, and then to work with Indigenous communities to implement other key steps in the report and promote community buy-in.

  “There is an opportunity with these recommendations to more fully support First Nations in their voting and elections through funding and resources,” says Goodman.

  Nicole Goodman and Chelsea Gabel are available for media interviews about the report.

   

  For more information or assistance arranging interviews:

  * Dan Dakin, Manager Communications and Media Relations, Brock University [email protected] or 905-347-1970

  – 30 –

  Categories: Media releases