Articles by author: Brock University

  • Unity needed to combat cybercrime in schools, says Brock prof

    EXPERT ADVISORY – January 22, 2025 – R0012

    As details of a data breach affecting school boards across Canada continue to emerge, cybersecurity expert Aaron Mauro is encouraging everyone to answer the collective call to enhance online security.

    First discovered on Dec. 28, the cyberattack targeted PowerSchool, an administration software platform used widely by school boards across North America. Cybercriminals gained access to the platform and stole student records in several Canadian provinces.

    The high-profile data breach has since drawn the attention of Canada’s privacy commissioner, whose office is now looking into the incident.

    “The issue of cybersecurity is not merely a problem for IT to solve, rather a problem society and communities must solve together,” says Mauro, Associate Professor of Digital Media at Brock University.

    PowerSchool’s reporting is offering a range of supports to affected students, including identity theft protection for up to two years.

    In the case of employees with compromised SSN/SIN numbers, the risk of identity theft will last much longer if their data is traded or aggregated into other collections of compromised data.

    Organizations and institutions of all sizes are exposed to global threats by the very fact of internet connectivity, Mauro says.

    “We should instill strong security literacy in our workforce and foster resiliency by making cybersecurity practices commonplace and common sense,” he says. “Identifying and protecting systems from threats should be an everyday practice for all employees working in environments with sensitive data, such as education.”

    According to Microsoft’s 2024 Digital Defense Report, the educational sector makes up 21 per cent of all cyberattacks.

    “The people who commit crimes against schools are not good people; they are attacking a target that does not have intrinsic financial value — the inherent vulnerability of children,” Mauro says.

    The PowerSchool breach is an example of a “hack and leak attack,” he says, where the threat of leaking data requires schools to pay to protect students’ privacy. While PowerSchool paid a fee to those responsible, there are no guarantees the stolen data was destroyed.

    According to the Canadian Centre for Cybersecurity, paying ransoms in a hack and leak operation is risky, noting that cybercriminals may demand more money, continue to attack or simply sell the compromised data online.

    “Of course, criminals are not trustworthy, so there is very little assurance that they would keep the exfiltrated data private,” Mauro says.

    In Ontario, digital infrastructure should be the responsibility of the Ontario Digital Service, he says. “Moving forward, we could all benefit from a centralized system for education records that is as well protected as our medical records, tax records and other government operations.”

    Mauro says parents and guardians should also be advocating for increased support for security processes in schools.

    “Practices like Multifactor Authentication and strong password policies will help harden these targets a great deal,” he says.

    In the case of the PowerSchool data breach, Mauro says parents have a right to be informed regarding response and recovery efforts, and that transparent reporting of cyberattacks helps other organizations better prepare for future attacks.

    “Relying on under-regulated, closed source, proprietary software for security is perhaps no longer the best choice for our children,” he says.

     

    Aaron Mauro, Associate Professor of Digital Media at Brock University, is available for media interviews on this topic.

     

    For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

    *Sarah Ackles, Communications Specialist, Brock University [email protected] or 289-241-5483

    – 30 –

    Categories: Media releases

  • Businesses must plan before leaping into generative AI: NCO research

    MEDIA RELEASE – January 21, 2025 – R0011

    Employees who use generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in Niagara’s small businesses and non-profit organizations tend to do so quietly and independently and are driven more by personal interest than by organizational direction, says new Brock University research.

    The Niagara Community Observatory’s (NCO) recent policy brief, Navigating Generative AI: Implications for Small Businesses and Non-Profits, shows that while employees may be enthusiastic about this emerging technology’s potential to increase efficiency, the downsides of GAI should also be identified and addressed as part of a well-planned organizational strategy.

    “When organizations fail to plan for GAI, they risk missing out on its benefits or, worse, encountering unintended consequences that could affect trust, efficiency, engagement or even employee well-being,” says Assistant Professor of Communication, Popular Culture and Film Kate Cassidy, co-author of the brief.

    GAI, a popular example of which is ChatGPT, is used to create text, videos and images as well as solve problems.

    To understand the experience of GAI’s early adopters, Cassidy and Assistant Professor of Communication, Popular Culture and Film Michelle Chen interviewed 14 representatives of small- and medium-sized enterprises and non-profit organizations based in Niagara and southern Ontario.

    Those interviewed ranged from chief executive officers to employees holding marketing, research, operations, administration and human resources positions.

    “By serving as a sounding board or a brainstorming partner, GAI has helped our participants overcome blocks in the creative and writing process,” says Chen.

    She says GAI is viewed as being more like an assistant, automating tasks that require low mental effort and allowing employees “to spend more time on tasks that they enjoy, particularly ones that require problem solving and critical thinking.”

    But benefits were offset by concerns about GAI’s content creation, including:

    • inauthentic, awkward style or tone of writing
    • factually incorrect and misleading information
    • biases that perpetuate sexism, racism and cultural stereotypes
    • unintentional copyright, trademark or patent infringement
    • insecurity of how user data information is stored, processed and potentially used

    “We heard that overusing GAI can leave employees feeling unfulfilled and disconnected from their work and the organization,” says Cassidy. “Some participants missed the sense of belonging that comes from collaborating with colleagues, and the creativity sparked by unique human experiences coming together during brainstorming.”

    To address these and other concerns, and to leverage GAI’s ability to make tasks carried out by humans more efficient, the authors list several recommendations for local small businesses, non-profit organizations, governments, universities, colleges and others.

    These include offering:

    • Sector-specific workshops not only describing basic GAI use but also exploring digital literacy, how GAI can align with organizational goals and support collaboration and decision-making.
    • Public education initiatives to explain how GAI works, how to increase digital literacy and to raise awareness of ethical issues surrounding GAI use.
    • ‘Toolkits’ that contain templates of guidelines, metrics and risk management checklists.
    • Knowledge-sharing forums that discuss GAI’s benefits and challenges.
    • Business networks that keep on top of GAI regulations and help with access to affordable compliance consultation.
    • Targeted support for non-profit organizations to adopt GAI effectively.
    • Representation of small businesses in provincial and national policy discussions regarding GAI access and compliance, with financial support for training and resources.

    Chen also says GAI doesn’t replace critical thinking and creative skills.

    “To fully benefit from the capabilities of GAI, one still needs to know the correct prompts to use as well as whether the output is accurate, which requires subject knowledge expertise that comes from experience and training,” she says.

    Cassidy says GAI planning, policies and training “shouldn’t be left to chance.”

    “A balanced, thoughtful approach is essential to leverage this technology effectively while managing its potential downsides,” she says.

    For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

    *Sarah Ackles, Communications Specialist, Brock University [email protected] or 289-241-5483

    – 30 –

    Categories: Media releases