Articles from:April 2021

  • Climate debate heats up as Brock research shows disparity among predictive models

    MEDIA RELEASE: 26 April 2021 – R0053

    While climate change is regarded as one of the world’s most pressing issues, questions remain about how quickly the globe is warming.

    Rather than relying on predictive models, a research team led by Brock University Earth Sciences Professor Uwe Brand has discovered a way to accurately measure atmospheric oxygen levels at any given geologic time — providing historical insight into the world’s state.

    In a recent Earth-Science Reviews article, Brand discusses this new approach to determining past atmospheres while also touching on issues that arise from use of predictive models in related research.

    In the absence of a time machine, how does one know what atmospheric levels were throughout geologic history? In the 1950s, scientists held the view that oxygen and water levels were constant, while scientists today agree they are in a dynamic state of flux.

    The answer lies in the three building blocks of life: water, nutrients and oxygen, Brand says.

    “On Earth, researchers try to find remnants of ancient life and study them to better understand our atmosphere climate history,” he says. “We agree that the globe is warming, but how fast it will rise in the next 20 to 50 years is not agreed upon.”

    Predictive models have produced no consensus, instead dividing scientists into two camps.

    Geochemists believe the presence of oxygen in the atmosphere drove the advancement of life as we know it. Paleobiologists, on the other hand, challenge this by noting only about five to 10 per cent of ancient data survives in the rock record and each sample is locked to a geographical location making it difficult to extrapolate an atmosphere climate model that fits to the entire world. Paleobiologists claim that geochemist models have failed to prove their assertions.

    Brand says his team’s research is “different from all current models because we are no longer using a model.”

    “We are using a direct proxy from ancient sources. We aren’t predicting, we are measuring.”

    In a 2016 paper, Brand and his colleagues described how they placed halite (the natural form of table salt) samples in a vacuum chamber and crushed the samples into small pieces. As the samples are broken, the trapped fossil gas is drawn into a highly sensitive quadrupole mass spectrometer, which can read and analyze the gas content and composition.

    “It’s a direct measurement of the atmosphere of that time, not an interpretation,” Brand says.

    When the paper was released, the Earth Sciences community was skeptical about the results from the samples and Brand recognized they would need to calibrate more samples from around the world to unify the data.

    “It had to be global,” he says.

    The team then went on to pick modern samples from the U.S. (New Mexico), Australia, South Africa and the Bahamas and found they all produced the same results.

    “We are very confident you can take any halite sample in its preserved state and achieve the same results,” Brand says.

    Brand’s research team can now more accurately describe atmospheric oxygen levels at a given geologic time on a global scale without using a predictive model.

    Faculty of Mathematics and Science Dean Ejaz Ahmed is pleased with the level of accuracy Brand can attain with the sampling method.

    “The confirmation that halite samples are consistent globally is a big step forward for climate research,” he says.

    Brock University Earth Sciences Professor Uwe Brand is available for media interviews.

    For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

    * Dan Dakin, Manager Communications and Media Relations, Brock University [email protected] or 905-347-1970

    – 30 –

    Categories: Media releases

  • Why Faces Matter: Brock researchers to discuss facial recognition, impact of first impressions at public event

    MEDIA RELEASE: 22 April 2021 – R0052

    At a time when many of the faces we encounter are either covered by masks or seen only on a computer screen, a Brock event will shed light on how people see others in their daily lives, and why it matters.

    One’s ability to recognize faces, as well as first impressions based on perceptions of faces, will be the subject of “Why Faces Matter: Recognizing People and Forming First Impressions across the Lifespan,” a free public webinar hosted by the Lifespan Development Research Institute on Thursday, April 29 from 12:30 to 1:30 p.m.

    Professor Catherine Mondloch in the Department of Psychology will be joined by PhD student Claire Matthews (BA ’15, MA ’17) and master’s students Sophia Thierry and Anita Twele to discuss findings from their work in Mondloch’s Face Perception Lab.

    After Mondloch provides a broad overview of face perception research, Matthews will talk about her research into how young children recognize new faces, a skill that can affect their social interactions.

    “It’s really easy to recognize familiar faces, but even for young adults it’s quite difficult when we don’t know someone,” Matthews says. “How do we build up that familiarity and get to a point where we can recognize someone?”

    Matthews, who previously completed work on how adults perceive faces from other races as part of her master’s research, says that life experience plays a key role in one’s ability to recognize faces, and that people overestimate their ability to recognize others most of the time.

    “In our daily life, we rely on recognizing faces to verify identity — showing an ID card to buy alcohol or cross the border, for example — and there is this assumption that we can accurately tell if that is the person standing in front of you,” says Matthews. “People don’t realize just how difficult it is, even though it might seem like a simple skill. Understanding how this ability changes across the lifespan is critical.”

    Thierry and Twele will speak about their work on how strongly first impressions can affect behaviour toward children and older adults.

    Mondloch says their studies may surprise the audience, as they show just how much of an impact first impressions can have on behaviour.

    “If, for example, two individuals are running for office and you ask people who have no idea who these candidates are to decide which of them looks more competent, those judgments predict who’s going to win the election,” says Mondloch. “If you ask children which of the politicians they would rather have as the captain of their ship on a voyage, their selections predict the election outcome, too.”

    The researchers also note that while people can’t stop themselves from forming first impressions, they can choose how to act.

    “These things happen deep in the brain, within 100 milliseconds, so we are always going to form first impressions,” says Mondloch. “But if people are mindful of that, maybe we can hit pause before we act on those first impressions.”

    The “Why Faces Matter: Recognizing People and Forming First Impressions across the Lifespan” webinar is free to attend but advance registration is required.

    Mondloch also encourages members of the community interested in participating in research at the Face Perception Lab to register with Growing With Brock, or to contact the lab for more information on current studies.

    For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

    * Dan Dakin, Manager Communications and Media Relations, Brock University [email protected] or 905-347-1970

    – 30 –

    Categories: Media releases