Media releases

  • Brock team researching worker health in home offices

    MEDIA RELEASE: 20 July 2021 – R0079

    Whether curled up on the couch, balancing on a stool at a kitchen island or sitting up in bed, people working from home during COVID lockdowns have adopted a variety of positions as they carry out their day-to-day activities at their computers.

    How people are positioned as they work for hours at a time may unwittingly be causing short- and long-term muscle and bone problems, say Brock Assistant Professor of Kinesiology Shawn Beaudette and Associate Professor of Kinesiology Michael Holmes.

    The duo has launched an international online survey asking stay-at-home desk workers a variety of questions related to their working habits, physical activity and their musculoskeletal health.

    “Much of the ongoing research associated with COVID-19 has been looking at the direct effects of COVID-19,” says Beaudette. “What we’re looking at with this research is some of the secondary effects of COVID-19. Specifically, how does this new sedentary lifestyle combined with sub-optimal working conditions affect somebody’s musculoskeletal health and well-being?”

    The musculoskeletal system includes interactions among bones, muscles, soft tissues, cartilage, tendons and ligaments to support body weight and to carry out movements.

    For those working at desks most of the day, many workplaces provide specialized equipment to support the body in ways that would prevent repetitive strain injuries such as lower back pain and carpal tunnel syndrome.

    But those working in home offices without such specialized equipment, or people who adopt unorthodox positions as they work, might be vulnerable to aches, pains and even injury, says Holmes, Canada Research Chair in Neuromuscular Mechanics and Ergonomics

    “Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, people rushed to makeshift home office set-ups that were less than ideal,” he says. “At the workplace, many people have an adjustable chair, external monitors and computer peripherals that help get them through the workday pain free.

    “Without this specialized equipment and a lack of separating ‘office’ from ‘home,’ the effects can be cumulative,” Holmes says. “Poor office ergonomics may lead to a person feeling discomfort at the end of the workday. These discomforts can lead to poor motivation and more sedentary behaviour — and to the cycle continuing.”

    Holmes and Beaudette, along with Kinesiology graduate student Daniel Cousins and Medical Sciences undergraduate student Bailey Shaefer, created a survey for workers 18 years of age and older who currently hold full-time employment and who at least partially transitioned into working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The research team is asking participants for details about where and how they’re sitting as they work, if they are using any specialized ergonomic equipment, their movements as they take on additional duties such as child care, their access to health-care workers, and if they’re experiencing any pain in their neck, back, arms and legs.

    The aim of this research is to uncover any changes in these areas due to the sudden shift in working environment, says Holmes.

    To accomplish this, participants are being asked to rate their musculoskeletal health before COVID lockdowns were implemented, and at the height of any lockdown measures they have experienced since the beginning of the pandemic.

    “Not only are we surveying how participants are interacting with their workstations, we are also interested in measuring each participant’s level of physical activity (both work related and elective) to understand if added physical activity can moderate any work-related musculoskeletal discomfort,” says Beaudette.

    He says survey results will help guide future lockdowns in optimizing worker safety and encouraging physical activity.

    So far, around 200 participants in more than eight countries have responded to the survey, says Beaudette. The researchers are aiming to have 2,000 responses by the end of the year.

    To participate in the survey, visit: brock.ca1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3Jh9LMh85xGE9CK

    For more information or for assistance arranging interviews: 

    * Dan Dakin, Manager Communications and Media Relations, Brock University [email protected] or 905-347-1970 

    – 30 –

    Categories: Media releases

  • Farmers’ insights needed for Brock agriculture tech research

    MEDIA RELEASE: 16 July 2021 – R0078

    If you’re a farmer in Niagara, particularly a greenhouse grower, Amy Lemay wants to hear from you.

    The Research Fellow at Brock University is conducting interviews with Niagara’s crop and livestock farmers about their use — or non-use — of automation and robotics technologies in their agricultural operations.

    “We’re trying to understand how the Niagara agricultural innovation ecosystem works,” says Lemay. “The project is about identifying the barriers and challenges to the adoption of automation robotics technologies, with the purpose of informing policy around the adoption of these advanced technologies.”

    Lemay is part of a Brock research team, headed by Professor of Political Science Charles Conteh, that is examining the potential for automation to pave the way for globally competitive production systems to be created in Ontario’s agri-food sector.

    Last year, the team received a grant from Ontario’s Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) to carry out this work.

    The team has completed the first phase of the research and is now in the second phase, which involves Lemay conducting in-depth interviews with a sample of those in agricultural production.

    While she’s heard from a number of farmers, she needs to connect with more, in addition to greenhouse growers.

    “We’re particularly interested in farmers who have some experience with using automation and robotics technologies, but it’s not necessary for them to have that experience,” says Lemay, adding that she’s keen to know about their decision not to use such technologies and how they remain competitive in the sector.

    Examples of automation and robotics technologies could include sensors in greenhouses and barns that monitor factors such as temperature, humidity, animal behaviour and feeding levels; GPS or GIS used in the field; machines to help with seeding and fertilization rates; and any kind of automation in harvesting, grading and sorting, among other innovations.

    Subject areas Lemay aims to cover during interviews include:

    • A description of specific automation and robotics technologies farmers are using.
    • Why they’re using these technologies and what expectations they have for what the technologies will provide for them.
    • How long it took them to implement technologies and see the benefits.
    • From whom they get information about automation and robotics technologies, and who they interact with in the sector.
    • Who they think is responsible for promoting and supporting the adoption of these advanced technologies.

    “I hope to capture a whole range of farmers’ past experiences and look into the future,” says Lemay. “I’m also interested in their impressions of what policies and programs have been effective in promoting and supporting the adoption of these technologies, and if they have any ideas on more effective policies and programs.”

    Lemay says the one-on-one interviews are conducted by telephone and take about an hour to complete.

    Those interested in becoming involved in the research should contact Lemay at [email protected]

    For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

    * Maryanne St. Denis, Writer/Web Editor, Brock University [email protected] or 905-246-0256

    – 30 –

    Categories: Media releases