Articles from:December 2016

  • Canada’s winemakers get in on ‘secret’ Fizz Club

    MEDIA RELEASE: R00258 – 16 December 2016

    As Canadians decide on beverages to serve during the holidays, a growing number will buy sparkling wines, much of it Canadian made.
     
    Consumers are choosing bubbly like never before — sparkling wine sales in Ontario jumped nearly 12 per cent this year alone.
     
    Against that backdrop, 40 of Canada’s top sparkling winemakers journeyed to Brock University this week for a clandestine meeting that has come to be known as Fizz Club. No media or sales agents here: This off-the-record gathering is where industry professionals compare notes, discuss production and talk candidly in a closed-door setting with a members-only feel.
     
    Organized by Brock’s Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute and led by Brock scientist Belinda Kemp, the meeting also gives winemakers the opportunity to hear about research developments and openly discuss issues relating to sparkling wine production.
     
    This year’s fourth annual Fizz Club focused on rose sparkling wine, drawing attendees from across Ontario and Quebec, while one British Columbia winemaker sent in wines for feedback.
     
    Wednesday’s gathering also had a bonus attraction. Bernard Richet, an expert from France’s Institut Oenologique de Champagne, spoke for more than an hour about techniques that European winemakers use to deal with the delicate challenges of holding the colour and fruity flavours in rose sparkling wines.
     
    “What he said was incredibly helpful and important, giving people knowledge they can use,” said Kemp, an oenologist whose research specializes in sparkling wines. “People told us it was valuable to have an international speaker of this background. One grower said it provided new approaches to consider using in their operation.”
     
    Fizz Club has come into its own at a time when both consumption and production of sparkling wine is rising in Ontario.
     
    “Sparkling wine is not just for celebrations anymore,” said member Emma Garner, winemaker at Thirty Bench in Beamsville, Ont. 
     
    The numbers bear it out. In terms of sparkling wines last year, sales of imports rose 11.9 per cent, while Ontario VQA shot up 10.5 per cent, representing total sales of $4 million.
     
    “Ontario wineries clearly have everything it takes to make great rose and sparkling wines and to craft great brands,” said Astrid Brummer, category manager for Ontario wines at the LCBO. “However, the fact that VQA sales represent just 3.5 per cent of overall sparkling sales tells me that there is enormous opportunity for Ontario brands to steal share from the luxury Champagne or super-cool Prosecco segments.”
     
    Grabbing a larger share of the market is typically what Fizz Club conversations focus on. For Marc Theberge, a sparkling winemaker from Quebec, attending Fizz Club gave him an opportunity to hear insight into Ontario trends.

    “It’s always fun to hear different perspectives,” Theberge said. “It was nice to be able to see production trends in Ontario Rose and the differences between our provinces.”
     
    Scientists like Kemp also realize a gathering like Fizz Club is something special.
     
    “I’ve never heard of this type of winemakers-only forum — where they spend a day focusing on one wine style, sharing ideas and real-time research findings — happening anywhere else,” she said.

    Fizz Club also showcases the research of Brock students to a roomful of Canada’s top winemakers. Both undergrad and graduate students play direct roles in research that benefits Ontario’s wine industry, a hands-on culture that Kemp says helps Brock oenology and viticulture graduates maintain an employment record of more than 90 per cent.

    “It is a unique opportunity for undergrads to get training in sparkling wine production and be part of research projects that directly assist the industry and have economic impact.”

    For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

    * Dan Dakin, Media Relations Officer, Brock University [email protected], 905-688-5550 x5353 or 905-347-1970

    – 30 –
     

    Categories: Media releases

  • Experts available to comment on cannabis task force findings

    EXPERT ADVISORY: R00257 – 14 December 2016

    A Brock University researcher says the federal government’s approach to legalizing marijuana is similar to how post-prohibition alcohol sales were treated.

    A task force studying recreational cannabis use has released a framework that it says the government should follow.

    Among its recommendations are:
    –    Sales should be restricted to those 18 and older, with provinces and territories able to set age restrictions older than 18
    –    The personal possession limit should be set at 30 grams
    –    Cannabis should be sold in storefronts, but not in locations also selling alcohol and tobacco products
    –    Products should be sold in plain packaging
    –    The number of stores should be regulated, and kept away from schools, community centres and parks
    –    Tax revenues should fund public education campaigns and research on the effects of marijuana consumption

    Brock University has two experts available to comment on the recommendations.
    Department of Health Sciences associate professor Dan Malleck is an expert on Canadian drug and alcohol policy and history. Department of Sport Management associate professor Curtis Fogel is an expert on drug control policy and sport law.

    “My initial reaction was it was fairly comprehensive,” Malleck says. “Some elements are surprising and some are what we expected. I think it’s a completely reasonable report. It’s incredibly dull in it’s lack of anything shocking, but that’s what you’re looking for in a policy like this.”

    Malleck says one thing that stands out is the age limit being set at 18 years:
    “With all the rhetoric they got from various stakeholders, it is a surprising limit.  However, it makes sense to leave it to the provinces because liquor law ages vary across the country.”

    He says the recommendation against selling cannabis alongside alcohol and tobacco was also unexpected: “It’s going to create a whole new administration around cannabis.”

    Malleck thinks this is a strategy to deal with bad optics: “The best people to manage access to controlled recreational substances are those whose job already is to control access to controlled recreational substances, like a liquor control board.”

    He says the idea of locating cannabis stores away from parks and schools is also a measure to calm public anxiety: “It’s this idea of persistent moralism. This is right out of the LCBO playbook from the 1920s and 30s that locating it near a school or church had this imbedded fear or guilt by association into it.

    “The distribution system should be able to deal with kids coming in trying to buy pot. So if you think your system of who’s selling this stuff is so bad that you have to worry about it being too close to a school, then you have to rethink your system of distribution. It’s clearly the optics of having it near a school that is the real issue here.”

    Fogel, an associate professor in Sport Management, recently published a paper with Geraint Osborne from the University of Alberta specifically examining the use of recreational cannabis use. “Perspectives on Cannabis Legalization Among Canadian Recreational Users” focuses on working adults and grad students who use cannabis recreationally.

    “One interviewee was a star student who reportedly smokes 10 joints a day and maintains near perfect grades while another was a Grammy-award winning musician,” Fogel says. “We looked at challenging some of the myths and stereotypes on the responsible, and potentially productive, use of marijuana.”

    He says the research is changing on what cannabis use looks like.
    “It’s very different than the early research on marijuana that said it makes people lazy or unproductive.”

    Fogel has been researching the issue for nearly a decade since he was an undergrad student at the University of Alberta.
    “At that time, the Jean Cretien government was in place and they were moving toward de-criminalization of it, but that came with other issues. Our argument was to move toward legalization. This is definitely an important step.”

    For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

    * Dan Dakin, Media Relations Officer, Brock University [email protected], 905-688-5550 x5353 or 905-347-1970

    – 30 –
     

    Categories: Media releases