Media releases

• Adding femicide to Canada’s Criminal Code first step in long road, says Brock prof

  Friday, July 22, 2022 | By Brock University

  EXPERT ADVISORY: 22 July 2022 – R0082

  Including femicide in the Criminal Code of Canada is a needed move, but one that must be backed by an action plan for change to begin, says Cristina Santos.

  The Associate Professor in Brock University’s Department of Modern Languages, Literatures and Cultures supports the London Police Board’s recent call on the federal government to see Canada legally recognize femicide as gender-specific homicide.

  But she also knows the work doesn’t stop there.

  “We need action points and timelines to implement,” Santos says, “and ways in which to enforce them.”

  According to the Canadian Femicide Observatory for Justice and Accountability, 48 per cent of solved homicides with a female victim were committed by a spouse or other intimate partner in 2015, the latest year data from Statistics Canada are available. The observatory also indicates Indigenous women and girls are 12 times more likely to be murdered or missing than other women in Canada.

  Even with inclusion in the Criminal Code and an action plan, it doesn’t mean rates of femicide — the killing of females by males because of their gender — will change, says Santos.

  “Several countries in Latin America have incorporated feminicide in their legal codes, yet these crimes continue to rise,” research assistant Sarah Revilla Sanchez (MA ’18) says of the term, which looks more broadly at how violence against women is rooted in ongoing social and political gender inequalities. “Feminicide was incorporated in the Mexican Criminal Code 10 years ago. Today, Mexico is among the countries with the highest gendered killing rates.”

  Through a project funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Insight Grant, Santos and Revilla Sanchez are currently researching violence against women in the context of the Argentinian disappearances of 1976 to 1983. Their work looks at the psychological impact trauma has on both individuals and society as a whole, and includes the study of both femicide and feminicide.

  “Canada is suffering a national crisis of missing and murdered women and girls, and this is also part of an international crisis of a specific brand of gender-targeted violence and murder,” says Santos. Canada and some Latin American countries, she adds, share common points of colonial past and its legacies of racism and perceptions of the female body as another colonized subject.

  “The racism and gendered violence of colonization has persisted into our modern times and endures in how we talk about power, gender and dominant patriarchal ideologies,” Santos says. “It is a global pandemic that can mark female bodies as ‘disposable’ and less grievable because of their gender, race, ethnicity and sexuality, amongst other factors.”

  Santos points to social movements such as the REDress Project in Canada, Ni Una Menos in Argentina, and Zapatos Rojos in Mexico as forms of testimonial art that seek to raise awareness of femicide and violence against women as well as providing alternative ways to mourn and memorialize murdered and missing women. These types of testimony have the power to challenge the social and political ideologies behind racialized and gendered violence against women, she says.

  “By defining femicide within the Canadian Criminal Code, we hope that it is a step towards reconciling a history of gendered violence and providing a testimony of social injustices by acknowledging historical truths previously overlooked from national discourses.”

  Cristina Santos, Associate Professor in Brock University’s Department of Modern Languages, Literatures and Cultures, is available for media interviews on the topic.

  For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

  * Doug Hunt, Communications and Media Relations Specialist, Brock University dhunt2@brocku.ca or 905-941-6209 

  – 30 –

  Categories: Media releases

• Brock experts say actions must accompany Pope’s expected apology to Indigenous communities

  Thursday, July 21, 2022 | By Brock University

  EXPERT ADVISORY: 21 July 2022 – R0081

  When Pope Francis arrives in Canada Sunday to continue reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples, he must deliver more than an apology for the Catholic Church’s role in the residential school system, say Brock University experts.

  The Pope will meet with Indigenous communities in Alberta, Quebec and Nunavut from July 24 to 29 and is expected to issue an apology while on Canadian soil — one of 94 Calls to Action laid out by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

  “Action must follow words,” says Brock University Assistant Professor of Education Stanley ‘Bobby’ Henry, a member of the Six Nations of the Grand River Territory community.

  “It’s a repeating pattern for organizations, agencies and governments to follow an apology with concrete action that results in meaningful change, but this has not always been the case,” he says. “Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper apologized on behalf of Canada and Canadians but later argued that Canada has no history of colonialism. In short, an apology doesn’t bring home the children lost to the system.”

  Henry says one of the key actions that must now take place is the release of additional records by the Catholic Church and other organizations that oversaw residential schools.

  “I know many scholars and experts in the field of residential schools have said some government and Church records are intentionally being withheld from the public,” he says. “If this is the case, we will never fully know the truth. We will forever be lodged in figuring out the truth when we should be reconciling.”

  Along with releasing its records, the Church and the current Pope must fully denounce the historical methodology it used to justify colonization, Henry says.

  “The Church needs to denounce the Doctrine of Discovery,” he says of the centuries-old papal statements that sought to morally and legally justify the displacement of Indigenous Peoples by explorers. “Residential schools were the weapons of colonization, whereas ancient legal doctrines allowed the mistreatment of Indigenous people to happen. If our humanity was respected throughout history and our rights were not denied, I firmly believe Canada’s history would have looked very different.”

  Should action be taken by the Catholic Church, it would be considered part of the restorative justice process, which is intended to repair harm and restore relationships “toward a greater sense of equilibrium,” says Shannon Moore, Professor in Brock’s Department of Child and Youth Studies.

  Participation in the process must be voluntary, sensitive towards power relationships and social and structural inequalities, and is shaped by the needs of the communities impacted by wrongdoing or crime, says Moore, a counselling psychologist and registered psychotherapist who has been engaged in restorative justice research and practice for more than two decades.

  The issuing of an apology must begin with understanding, acknowledging and taking responsibility for the truth and the impact of harm caused, she says.

  Moore says there are four steps to making an authentic, effective apology:

  • understanding and acknowledging the truth of the harm caused
  • articulating that wrong-doing clearly and taking responsibility for the harm caused
  • expression of sincere regret for the harm caused
  • reparation and action to address the harm caused

  Forgiveness is complex, individual, “extremely painful” and is not necessarily a given outcome of an apology or restorative justice process, Moore says.

  “Forgiveness is not an event but a process that takes time; healing is not instant,” she says. “Similar to forgiveness, we may go through the excruciating pain of lancing a wound, allowing the toxicity to drain from the body, and then wait for the healing to begin.”

  But before Canadian society can begin thinking about the future, it still has much to learn about the horrors of the past, Henry says.

  “The majority of Canadians don’t know the history of Canada and Indigenous people,” he says. “Without knowledge, people will not know why an apology holds any significance. People will forget that reconciliation is part of treaties that allow Canada to exist. Simply put, Canadians will think that an apology for past atrocities means ‘everything is better, so let’s progress not regress,’ but they don’t realize that our current realities are shaped by atrocities their ancestors did — both willingly and unwillingly.”

  Henry says it’s important to remember that the Pope’s meeting with residential school survivors is not the defining moment of truth and reconciliation.

  “A lot of work is still needed,” he says. “The defining moment will be when Indigenous children have access to their culture and language in schools, Indigenous people can fully participate in society without facing racism, and settlers can call out injustices as they happen.”

  Brock University Assistant Professor of Education Stanley ‘Bobby’ Henry and Professor of Child and Youth Studies Shannon Moore are available for media interviews on the topic.

  For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:

  * Doug Hunt, Communications and Media Relations Specialist, Brock University dhunt2@brocku.ca or 905-941-6209

  – 30 –

  Categories: Media releases