MEDIA RELEASE: R00129 – 20 June 2016
NOTE: On the eve of National Aboriginal Day in Canada (June 21), please see the following story about a new book exploring the history of Indigenous healthcare.
Doreen Callihoo spent most of her childhood in an Indian hospital undergoing invasive treatments that eventually led to the loss of one of her lungs. Hospitalized at age eight, the First Nations girl spent 11 of the next 12 years in the Charles Camsell Indian Hospital in Edmonton.
As a tuberculosis patient, she underwent painful pneumothorax treatments twice a week, a procedure in which air was injected into her chest to collapse her lung. She was disfigured when twice she had several ribs removed, more procedures meant to collapse her lung. After a year on antibiotics, Callihoo left the hospital only to return to have her lung surgically removed, likely the result of years of invasive experimental treatments.
Brock University history professor Maureen Lux says Callihoo’s experience at the Indian hospital was not unusual. Until the 1970s, First Nations and Inuit patients often spent years in hospital undergoing tuberculosis treatments that ranged from bed rest to surgery to antibiotics.
In her new book Separate Beds: A History of Indian Hospitals in Canada, 1920s-1980s (University of Toronto Press), Lux examines Canada’s system of segregated health care which was rife with coercion and medical experimentation.
“The purpose of the Indian hospitals was to segregate and isolate Indigenous people from the rest of the population,” Lux says.
She says the hospitals — which were underfunded, understaffed and overcrowded ? were established to keep Indigenous tuberculosis patients isolated, but soon became a means of ensuring that other Canadians didn’t have to share access to more modern hospitals.
“Underfunded by design, and situated in redundant military barracks and residential schools, Indian hospitals would never draw personnel and resources from modernizing Canadian hospitals,” Lux says.
The patients in Indian hospitals received sub-standard care.
“Aboriginal patients were characterized as careless in their own health and therefore subjected to prolonged institutional treatment, and increasingly invasive surgery, for tuberculosis at a time when most non-Aboriginal patients were treated at home,” Lux says.
The philosophy behind Indian hospitals was similar to residential schools in that they intentionally isolated Indigenous people and removed them from Canadian society, she says.
And once again, she says Indigenous people were being told what was best for them with no input from their own communities.
“It’s only very recently that Indigenous leadership has had any say on how health care is received or delivered in their communities,” Lux says.
Lux came to the topic of segregated health care for Indigenous people through her research on the health and medical impacts of dispossession and settler capitalism — or colonization — on prairie Indigenous people in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. That research resulted in the book, Medicine That Walks: Disease, Medicine and Canadian Plains Native People, 1880-1940 (University of Toronto Press).
In Separate Beds, Lux describes the contradictory policies that governed the Indian hospitals and shares the experiences of patients and staff, and the vital grassroots activism that pressed the federal government to finally acknowledge its treaty obligations.
Separate Beds is available at the Brock University library or for purchase through University of Toronto Press and Amazon.
For more information or for assistance arranging interviews:
* Dan Dakin, Media Relations Officer, Brock University ddakin@brocku.ca, 905-688-5550 x5353 or 905-347-1970
-30 –
