SJRI has developed a Grants Program to support Affiliated Members with their transdisciplinary social justice research. Each Research Seed Grant is worth up to $4,000 in funding, with a total of $8,000 allocated to this type of grant.
There are two competitions for funding each year (in Spring and Fall).
Please contact Julie Gregory (SJRI Project Facilitator) at firstname.lastname@example.org with any questions regarding the application and/or adjudication process.
The grants adjudication committee also strongly recommends that you contact Julie for application support at least two calendar weeks in advance of submitting an application.
The next application due date is Monday November 30, 2020. Please send your application to email@example.com by this date.
SJRI Research Seed Grant proposals are expected to respond to the following objectives:
- fund research proposals that are animated by a concern for social justice;
- build knowledge and understanding using transdisciplinary perspectives;
- provide meaningful and high-quality research training experience for Brock students;
- fund original and high quality research proposals;
Research Seed Grants are designed to support transdisciplinary social justice research in its initial stages and help researchers, if appropriate, to leverage funding for larger external grants. The grants adjudication committee strongly recommends that you contact the SJRI Project Facilitator in advance of submitting a seed grant application.
The SJRI Research Seed Grants program is distinct from CRISS, BSIG, and other internal funding programs because its focus is on transdisciplinary social justice research and collaborations with a view toward funding projects that help sustain the SJRI.
Value and Duration
The maximum value of an SJRI Research Seed Grant is $4,000 for a period of one year. Any proposed variations from the project’s budget must be submitted in writing for prior approval. Any unused money will revert back to SJRI one year from the grant award date, unless an extension is requested in writing one month prior. Grant holders will automatically be granted a one year extension if needed.
Knowledge Mobilization and Acknowledgement
Grant holders may be asked to share findings at SJRI events such as a speaker series, AGM, and/or on the SJRI website. A final report is to be submitted, which includes information on participation, project outcomes, expenditures and additional funds secured. If applicable, electronic copies of publications, presentations, and promotional materials developed for the project should also be included. SJRI must be clearly acknowledged in all publications and presentations that occur as a result of the grant.
The Director of the SJRI will appoint an adjudication committee from among SJRI affiliates to score grant proposals and disperse research grants. The adjudication committee operates at arms-length from the SJRI Faculty Steering Committee, and its membership will remain confidential, known only to the SJRI Director and Project Facilitator. Members of the adjudication shall not evaluate grant proposals involving affiliates with whom they share a conflict of interest. As per Research Services’ protocol, names of the adjudication committee are available upon request after the adjudication process is has been completed.
Only SJRI affiliates are eligible to serve as principal applicants on SJRI Research Seed Grants. Preference will be given to those applicants who have not received a seed grant in the past two years.
The first page/title page of your application should include the title of your proposed project and names, contact info and affiliations for the principal and any co-applicants.
Attach a list of all references cited in your review of relevant literature (maximum 3 pages).
The rest of the application should speak directly to the evaluation criteria listed below and be organized accordingly.
Applications must be formatted single-spaced with a 12 point New Times Roman font. Applications that are not formatted properly will not be considered.
All proposed budgetary expenditures must adhere to Tri-Council guidelines. In the case of SJRI Research Seed Grants, additional budgetary expenditure restrictions are noted below.
Evaluation Criteria and Scoring (6 pages max + CV)
The following criteria and scoring scheme are used by adjudication committee members to evaluate SJRI Research Seed Grant applications:
- Significance (maximum 3 pages) (50%)
- expected contribution to knowledge;
- originality and significance;
- appropriateness of the literature review/works cited;
- evidence of transdisciplinarity;
- social justice focus;
- appropriateness of theories/methods.
- knowledge dissemination strategies.
- Record (no page maximum) (15%)
- CVs of the principal applicant and co-applicants must be attached to the application.
- Viability (maximum 2 pages) (25%)
- probability of effective and timely completion of the research;
- inclusion of a budget, indicating other grant support for this project;
- appropriateness of the requested budget and justification of proposed costs (SJRI Seed Grants may not be used to defray costs associated with: accommodation, sustenance, or conference travel);
- strategies and timelines for the design and conduct of the activity/activities proposed;
- Other considerations: please also comment at the end of this section on if and how your research plan incorporates physical distancing practices, adheres to public health guidelines and/or any other strategy and timeline considerations for undertaking the research within the current pandemic context (whatever that is at the time of writing your application). If such adjustments are not relevant provide a justification. These considerations will not count toward the 2-page section limit.
- Training and mentoring (maximum half page) (10%)
- quality of training and mentoring to be provided to Brock students;
- opportunities for Brock students to contribute to research;
- if training and mentoring is not relevant provide a justification.
Adjudication committee members assign a score for each of the criteria listed above, based on the following scoring table. The appropriate weighting is then applied to arrive at a final score. Applications must receive a score of 5 or above in each category in order to be considered for funding.
|9 to 10||Excellent|
|7 to 8.9||Very good|
|5 to 6.9||Good|
|Below 5||Not recommended for funding|