Local Engagement Grants

SJRI Community Engagement Grants are part of the Grants Program SJRI has developed to help support Affiliated Faculty Members in their transdisciplinary social justice research. SJRI Community Engagement Grants are for up to $2,000 in funding.

There are two competitions for funding each year (in March and November). Please contact Kathleen Uranick, SJRI Administrative Coordinator, at kuranick@brocku.ca for questions regarding the application and/or adjudication process.

The grants adjudication committee strongly recommends that you contact the SJRI Project Facilitator, Julie Gregory, at jgregory@brocku.ca for assistance and advice in advance of submitting an application.


An important part of SJRI’s mandate is to encourage productive connections between its affiliated researchers and Niagara community partners. At the same time many SJRI affiliates conduct important social justice-related collaborative work with community partners beyond the Niagara region; this work is also worth supporting. SJRI therefore offers two separately-adjudicated categories of Community Engagement Grants:

  • SJRI Community Engagement Grant – Niagara Region
  • SJRI Community Engagement Grant – Beyond Niagara

In both cases, SJRI Community Engagement Grants support transdisciplinary social justice- focused collaborations, partnerships, events, performances and outreach activities between Brock researchers and community partners with the goal of nurturing community partnerships. While SJRI Community Engagement Grants may serve as a first step toward securing an external grant (such as a SSHRC Connection Grant), this is not a requirement.

SJRI Community Engagement Grant proposals are expected to respond to the following objectives:

  • facilitate the multidirectional flow of social justice and transdisciplinary knowledge between Brock researchers and the relevant community;
  • support the development of robust reciprocal relationships between the SJRI and specific community organizations.

The SJRI Community Engagement Grant is distinct from CRISS, BSIG, and other internal funding programs because its focus is on transdisciplinary research and collaborations with a view toward building relationships and Brock/community partnerships. Therefore, funding of one time only events needs to be clearly justified within the context of building long-term partnerships. Possible examples include: focus groups, a series of meetings to facilitate relationship building, or community-orientated research cafes/salons.

Value and Duration

The maximum value of an SJRI Community Engagement Grant is $2,000 for a period of one year. Any unused monies will revert back to the SJRI. Grant holders will automatically be granted a one year extension (without additional funding) if needed.


SJRI must be acknowledged in all publications and presentations that occur as a result of the grant.


The Director of the SJRI will appoint an adjudication committee from among SJRI affiliates to score grant proposals and disperse research grants. The adjudication committee operates at arms-length from the SJRI Faculty Steering Committee, and its membership will remain confidential, known only to the Director and Administrative Coordinator. Members of the adjudication shall not evaluate grant proposals involving affiliates with whom they share a conflict of interest.


Only SJRI affiliates are eligible to serve as principal applicants on SJRI Community Engagement Grants. Preference will be given to those applicants who have not received a Local Engagement Grant in the past two years.

The first page/title page of your application should include the title of your proposed project and names, contact info and affiliations for the principal and any co-applicants. Please specify clearly whether you are applying to the “Niagara Region” or “Beyond Niagara” competition.

Attach a list of all references cited in your review of relevant literature (maximum 1 page).

The rest of the application should speak directly to the evaluation criteria listed below and be organized accordingly.

Applications must be formatted single-spaced with a 12 point Times New Roman font. Applications that are not formatted properly will not be considered.

All proposed budgetary expenditures must adhere to Tri-Council guidelines.

Evaluation Criteria and Scoring (3 pages max + CV)

The following criteria and scoring scheme are used by adjudication committee members to evaluate SJRI Community Engagement Grant applications. Please specify clearly whether you are applying to the “Niagara Region” or “Beyond Niagara” category; the categories are adjudicated separately.

  1. Significance of the initiative and relation to applicant’s research agenda (maximum 1 and a half pages) (50%)
    • how the initiative is relevant to your research agenda;
    • social justice focus;
    • evidence of transdisciplinarity;
    • originality and significance;
    • evidence of partnership with a local community organization/entity;
    • indication of and justification for participant group or audience;
    • significance to the relevant community and/or benefit to participant group or community partner;
    • expected contribution to the mobilization of knowledge including planned outcomes.
  2. Viability (maximum 1 page) (25%)
    • probability of effective and timely attainment of the proposal’s objectives;
    • inclusion of a budget, indicating other grant support for this project (where relevant);
    • appropriateness of the requested budget and justification of proposed costs;
    • quality of community engagement and knowledge mobilization plans;
    • strategies and timelines for the design and conduct of the activity/activities proposed.
  3. Record (no page maximum) (15%)
    • CVs of the principal applicant and co-applicants must be attached to the application.
  4. Training and mentoring (maximum half page) (10%)
    • quality of training and mentoring to be provided to Brock students and/or community members;
    • if training and mentoring is not relevant provide a justification.

Scoring table

Adjudication committee members assign a score for each of the criteria listed above, based on the following scoring table. The appropriate weighting is then applied to arrive at a final score.

9 to 10Excellent
7 to 8.9Very good
5 to 6.9Good
Below 5Not recommended for funding