Key standards organizations (IOM, Cochrane, CIHR, Campbell Collaboration) recommend librarians participate on the research team and/or be involved in developing the research question and literature searching strategy for any evidence synthesis project such as: systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and rapid reviews.
Good to Know
- Guide for Systematic reviews, scoping reviews and other evidence syntheses.
- Evidence synthesis reviews are time-intensive, resource-intensive projects generally not appropriate to assign as course-based projects, particularly for undergraduate students.
- Library support is generally reserved for projects with primary investigators based at Brock
- Learn more about the different types of review articles.
Levels of Systematic Review Service
Available to: all Brock students, post-doctoral fellows, research assistants, and faculty. Note: Faculty supervisors must attend initial meetings for graduate student projects.
This initial consultation (up to 1hr) may cover some or all of the following:
- An introduction to the components of evidence synthesis and related timelines
- Overview of the purpose of evidence synthesis (and/or specific review type)
- Steps in planning a synthesis review
- Advising on the type of research appropriate to the research question
Support needed beyond a initial single consultation may be considered as Tier 2: Extended Consultation.
Available to: Brock graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, research assistants and faculty; primary investigators for the project must be based at Brock.
Note: Faculty supervisors must attend initial meetings for graduate student projects.
Librarians involved in extended consultation are to be acknowledged by name as “participating investigators” in any resulting published research including theses and dissertations; researchers may use this acknowledgement template.
Before meeting with the librarian for an extended consultation, we ask researchers to complete Pages 1&2 of this work plan and submit it to the Librarian at least 24 hours in advance.
Up to 5 hours (which may include in-person meetings, emails, as well as librarian preparation time) of consultation may be provided on some or all of the following:
- Developing a search strategy for a synthesis review project
- Fine-tuning a research question
- Developing a base search strategy: selecting appropriate keywords, subject headings and search operators and advanced searching syntax
- Selecting appropriate databases, grey literature sources and other information resources
- Strategies for advanced searching in specific databases/sources
- Advice on search filters/hedges to capture elements such as study designs, population groups, etc.
- Using a specific tool (e.g. Zotero, Mendeley) for managing citations and removing duplicate citations
- Using a specific tool for screening citations and extracting data e.g. Covidence
- Selecting appropriate techniques and frameworks for synthesizing data
- Support beyond 5 hours is at the discretion of the librarian
Researchers may begin at Tier 2, or may begin with Tier 1 consultation and follow to Tier 2.
Available to: Brock faculty only. Collaboration must be proposed by the lead investigator(s). It is at the discretion of the librarian(s) to choose to participate as collaborators based on their time and interest in the project. Collaborating librarians are to be acknowledged by name as co-authors in any resulting published research.
Investigators and the librarian(s) must sign a memorandum of understanding outlining key responsibilities and timelines. Before meeting with the librarian for collaboration, researchers must also complete a work plan and submit it to the Librarian in advance of consultation. Librarians may be involved in any or all of the following activities:
- Attend team meetings and provide relevant expertise
- Assist with research question refinement
- Contribute to protocol development
- Arrange for Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies
- Design, test, translate and execute searches of bibliographic databases
- Search for grey literature
- Remove duplicate records from search results, record clean-up
- Provide literature search documentation, including a PRISMA flowchart
- Author relevant portions of the manuscript (e.g. Methods section)
- Editorial contributions to the final manuscript
- Participate in screening
- Other activities as negotiated
Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019). Meeting the review family: Exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 36(3), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276)
University of Saskatchewan Library Systematic Review Guidelines