The old adage of \u2018if you set your mind to it, you can accomplish anything\u2019 may not apply when it comes to improving students\u2019 grades, at least in a first-year university course.<\/p>\n
A study<\/a> conducted by two professors from the Goodman School of Business at Brock University examined how gaps between undergraduate students\u2019 target grades and their actual midcourse grades impacted their exam studying intentions and subsequent grade improvements.<\/p>\n Michael Armstrong and Herb MacKenzie recently received the Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education<\/em> Best Empirical Research Paper Award for their work, which analyzed survey responses and course grades from 250 undergraduate students enrolled in a first-year business course.<\/p>\n At the beginning of the course, students set goals for their final grades. After receiving midcourse grades, they adjusted their goals. Armstrong and MacKenzie expected students to modify their studying efforts so they could get closer to their new targets. The pair knew from psychology theories that if students\u2019 marks were worse than expected, they might study more to increase their performance. Conversely, if their midcourse grades were better than expected, they might relax a bit.<\/p>\n “We found students did react to grade gaps, though not as strongly as expected,\u201d said Armstrong. “The larger the gap between students\u2019 goal grades and their actual midcourse grades, the harder they intended to work and the more their grades actually improved after the final exam.\u201d<\/p>\n Digging deeper into the study, however, produced some unexpected results. The study\u2019s secondary measures investigated whether the relationship between studying intentions and grade improvements was affected by students\u2019 academic ability (measured by high school averages) and implicit theory of intelligence or \u2018mindset\u2019 (measured by questionnaire scores.)<\/p>\n Students with higher academic ability improved their grades more, despite not having any stronger intentions to perform well. Even more surprising to the researchers was that mindset had no impact on students\u2019 final grades. It didn’t matter if a student had a fixed mindset \u2014 thinking they have a certain level of intelligence and there was nothing they could do could change that \u2014 or a growth mindset \u2014 thinking if they worked harder, they could achieve more. The growth-oriented students didn\u2019t do any better in improving their grades than the fixed mindset students, even though their intentions to work harder were greater than the fixed mindset students.<\/p>\n \u201cThe growth-oriented students had higher ambitions, but those didn\u2019t actually lead to higher performance,\u201d said Armstrong. \u201cIt’s surprising because in most research, having a growth mindset is a positive thing. People with growth-orientated mindsets tend to do better in most aspects of life, whether at work, home or school. A fixed mindset would normally be considered negative, but in this case, it was not, perhaps because those students were a bit cautious about adjusting to first-year university.\u201d<\/p>\n Armstrong said although the results of the study may be disheartening to go-getters and positive thinkers, there are some valuable takeaways for instructors that may help students make better decisions and achieve more success in their studies.<\/p>\n He suggests instructors be more cautious and realistic when guiding their students, in particular, in first-year university courses. Instead of students setting high goals for themselves, instructors can help students set realistic expectations to not set them up for disappointment.<\/p>\n Students who participated in the study received a final course grade that was, on average, more than 20 percentage points lower than their high school average. Even though students lowered their expectations after receiving midcourse grades, their final averages were still lower than they hoped for.<\/p>\n Students began the course with an average high school mark of 84.5 per cent, with the average goal set at 78.3 per cent. After receiving an average midcourse grade of 63 per cent, students revised their goal to 69.1 per cent. The final course grade average was 61.5 per cent.<\/p>\n \u201cMany students underestimate what it takes to perform well in university,\u201d said MacKenzie. \u201cThey often start poorly, especially when compared to their high school performance. Some then go on to excellence, and some do not. To me, investigating why was important.\u201d<\/p>\n The published study, \u201cHow Gaps Between Target and Midcourse Grades Impact Undergraduates’ Studying Intentions and Grade Improvements” can be found at the Wiley Online Library<\/a>. The accepted manuscript can be downloaded without a subscription at the Brock Library<\/a>.<\/p>\n